Article Open Access

The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Benefit on QRIS User Satisfaction in Pontianak City

(1) Kartika Kartika Mail (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak, Pontianak, 78124, Indonesia)
(2) * Helman Fachri Mail (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak, Pontianak, 78124, Indonesia)
*Corresponding author

Abstract


The adoption of QRIS in Pontianak has continued to grow in line with changing payment patterns among the community. This study aims to analyze the influence of perceived ease of use and perceived benefit on QRIS user satisfaction. A quantitative method with an associative design was employed, involving 100 respondents selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed through validity and reliability testing, classical assumption tests, and multiple linear regression analysis. The results indicate that all instruments were valid and reliable, the data were normally distributed, and no multicollinearity was detected. Regression analysis produced a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.502. The F-test confirmed that both independent variables simultaneously have a significant effect on satisfaction (F = 48.806; p < 0.001). Partial tests showed that perceived ease of use (β = 0.401; p < 0.001) and perceived benefit (β = 0.274; p = 0.002) each exert a significant positive influence. In conclusion, QRIS user satisfaction is determined by the perceived ease of use and perceived benefits. The practical implication emphasizes the need for service providers to continuously improve accessibility, security, and the added value of transactions. Future research is recommended to incorporate additional variables such as trust or service quality and to extend the scope of study areas for broader generalization.

Keywords


Perceived Ease of Use; Perceived Benefit; Satisfaction

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i2.1133
      

Article metrics

Abstract views : 53 | PDF views : 11

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. (2024). The Technology Acceptance Model 30 Years of TAM. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Effendy, F. (2020). Pengaruh Perceived of Benefit Terhadap Niat Untuk Menggunakan Layanan Dompet Digital Di Kalangan Milenial. Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 15(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v15i2.67.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Guo, J., Kim, J.-H., & Wong, I. A. (2023). Cognitive structures of restaurants’ characteristics, consumers’ perceived benefits and values about medicated diet restaurants: A means-end chain approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 73–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.06.013.

Indrasari, M. (2019). Pemasaran dan Kepuasan Pelanggan: pemasaran dan kepuasan pelanggan. unitomo press.

Kim, W. Bin, Xie, J., & Choo, H. J. (2023). Role of perceived benefits of online shopping festival in vietnam: Differences between millennials and generation Z. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103530.

Nasfi, Rahmad, & Sabri. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Nasabah Perbankan Syariah. Ekonomika Syariah: Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v3i1.846.

Pekerti, R. I., & Briliana, V. (2016). Pengaruh perceived benefits, perceived risks, hedonic motivations, psychological factors dan website design terhadap online buying behavior. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 18(2), 147-158.

Sahir, S. H. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Jogjakarta: KBM Indonesia.

Sasongko, S. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Kepuasan Pelanggan Dan Loyalitas Pelanggan (Literature Review Manajemen Pemasaran). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan , 3(1), 104–114.

Siregar, S. (2020). Statistik Parametrik Untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press

Sumiyati, S., & Zabella, Z. (2023). The Effect of Customer Satisfaction on Repurchase Intention E-Money in Pontianak City. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i1.186.

Syarif, A., & Widodo, A. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kepuasan Konsumen menggunnakan Metode Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) dan Important Performance Analysis (IPA) pada Bengkel Auto2000 Asia Afrika Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 4(3), 685–701.

Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.Vol.7.No.9.537.

Widiyanti, W. (2020). Pengaruh Kemanfaatan, Kemudahan Penggunaan dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan E-Wallet OVO di Depok. Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, 7(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v7i1.7567.

Wiyono, J. (2021). Pengaruh perceived risk, perceived benefit dan brand image terhadap brand loyalty melalui strategic brand communication sebagai variabel moderasi. Fadzat Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 1(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.58787/fdzt.v1i2.7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Kartika, and Helman Fachri*

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0