(Department of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 15417, Indonesia)
(2) Ali Masyhar
(Department of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 15417, Indonesia)(3) Cahya Wulandari
(Department of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 15417, Indonesia)*Corresponding author
AbstractCorruption is an extraordinary crime that causes great harm to the country's finances and threatens social justice and national economic stability. The urgency of this study lies in the search for effective strategies to cause a deterrent effect against corruption perpetrators who have been considered still weak. This study aims to analyze the concept of asset seizure as an instrument of impoverishment of corruptors in order to strengthen the effectiveness of law enforcement and recovery of State losses. The research method used is juridical normative, with an analytical approach to legislation, legal doctrine, and relevant academic literature. The Data was collected through a literature study of primary legal materials (such as the corruption law and the TPPU law) and secondary legal materials in the form of research results and views of criminal law experts. The application of asset confiscation has a strategic role in returning state losses and impoverishing corruption perpetrators so that they no longer enjoy the results of their crimes. However, its effectiveness is still hampered by the absence of the Non-Conviction Based (NCB) asset seizure law and weak coordination between law enforcement agencies. The concept of impoverishment of corruptors through asset expropriation also has a philosophical basis in retributive justice theory and deterrence theory, which emphasize deterrent effects through the removal of economic gains from criminal acts. Asset seizure as an additional crime needs to be regulated more comprehensively in special regulations so that it can be applied consistently and transparently. Legal reform, increased inter-institutional coordination, and accelerated ratification of the asset seizure law are important steps in strengthening the eradication of corruption in Indonesia.
KeywordsAsset confiscation; impoverishment of corruptors; corruption
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i2.1249 |
Article metricsAbstract views : 110 | PDF views : 16 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Alam, S., Fajrin, Y. A., Al-Fatih, S., & Borsa, M. O. (2022). Islamic Criminal Law Study On The Seizure Of Corruptor Assets As An Indonesian’s Criminal Sanction In The Future. 21(2), 143–155.
Amalia, D. (2024). Kajian Teoritis Tentang Hukuman Pemiskinan Bagi Pelaku Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 1(4), 22–32.
Astuti, P. (N.D.). Politik Korupsi : Kendala Sistemik Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.
Aziz, M. H., Winarno, R., & Ariesta, W. (2025). Interdisciplinary Explorations In Researcatinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Muhammadh. Interdisciplinary Explorations In Research Journal (Ierj), 3(2), 564–581.
Dessy Rochman Prasetyo. (2016). Penyitaan Dan Perampasan Aset Hasil Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pemiskinan Koruptor. Dih Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(24), 149–163.
Dini Anastasya, Muhammad Rinaldy Bima, A. R. H. (2025). Implementasi Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 1–13.
Dita Veronikaa, B. A. (2025). Corporate Seizure Related To Corruption And Money. Journal, Indonesian Justice, Criminal, 1(2), 230–251. Https://Doi.Org/10.62264/Jlej.V2i1.19.7
Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas Korupsi Bersama Kpk (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi). Sinar Grafika.
Erlangga, D. M. (2025). Ruu Perampasan Aset_ Jangan Hapus Kasus Korupsi Masa Lalu. Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Ganjar, S. D. (2025). Analisis Perampasan Aset Tanpa Putusan Pidana Dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Of Journal, 7(3), 421–428.
Hasan, Z., Azra, A. H., Ramadhani, S., & Putri, M. L. (2025). Perampasan Aset Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Pemiskinan Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara, 3(1), 68.
Heru Susetyo. (2024). Percikan Pemikiran Makara Merah (4th Ed.). Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Husin, L. H., Pratama, H. M., Prasetyo, W., Darmawan, W. B., Manan, F., & Amsari, F. (2019). Malpraktik Dan Korupsi Pemilu Di Indonesia : Analisis Terhadap Proses Penghitungan Dan Rekapitulasi Pada Pemilu 2019. Ntegritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 57–78. Https://Doi.Org/10.32697/Integritas.V7i1.720
Januar, F. R., Muntaqo, F., & Nashriana. (2022). Konstruksi Hukum Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Terhadap Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dijatuhkan Putusan Bebas. Lex Lata, 2(1), 1–22.
Kesatuan, N., & Indonesia, R. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. 16100.
Komalasari, R., & Mustafa, C. (2024). Penguatan Upaya Pemulihan Aset : Jalan Menuju Mitigasi Korupsi Di Sektor Publik. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 137–148.
Lamintang, P. A. ., & Lamintang, F. T. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. In Sinar Grafika (P. 1).
Lily Solichul Mukminah ,Hartiwiningsih, O. Y. H. (2023). The Importance Of Regulating Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Cases In Indonesia. Iblam Law Review, 3(1), 31–45.
Lisa Dwi Fitriyanti*1, A. S. (2025). Perampasan Aset Sebagai Sanksi Tambahan : Analisis Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia 1. Jaksa, 3(3), 13–27.
Loeke Larasati. (2017). Memberantas Korupsi Di Indonesia_ Meningkatkan Pemulihan Aset. Idlo - Organisasi Hukum Pembangunan Internasional.
Munzil, F., & Wr, I. R. (2015). Kesebandingan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dan Pengganti Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Rangka Melindungi Hak. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 22(1), 25–53.
Nations, U. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
Ningrum, A. P., Al, M. D., Hariani, N. J., Supeno, E., Public, I., & Network, P. (2025). Research Article The Price Of Politics : Institutional Reengineering As Anti-Corruption Dismantlement Under Jokowi ’ S. 24(1), 92–121. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Jis.24.1.2025.92-121
Putri, D. D. P., & Universitas. (2024). Penerapan Perampasan Aset Sebagai Pidana Tambahan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Samudra Keadilan, 19(2), 302–319.
Rasima, D., & Pd, M. (2025). Anti Korupsi (M. K. La Ode Alifariki, S.Kep., Ns. & Diterbitkan (Eds.); 1st Ed.). Pt Media Pustaka Indo.
Saragih, P. D. Y. M. (2024). Monograph Memberantas Korupsi Dengan Pemiskinan Koruptor Dalam Perspektif Hukum (1st Ed.). Tahta Media Group.
Simanjuntak, A. J. L. P. (2025). Pengembalian Dan Pembuktian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Rio Law Jurnal, 6(2), 1112.
Sumardiana, B. (2025). Konsep Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Melalui Gugatan In Rem Berdasarkan Pendekatan Economic Analysis Of Law. Reformasi Hukum, 29(1), 52–69.
Susilo, J. S., Danil, E., & Mulyati, N. (2023). Pemiskinan Koruptor Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Tambahan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Rancangan Undang-Undangan Perampasan Aset. 6(1), 3718–3730.
Tri Indah Purwanti, Anna Maria Saragih, Nining Widyaningrum, T. S. (2023). Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan Dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan Terhadap Tugas Dan Fungsi Ppatk. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi (Jmbi Unsrat), 11(3), 1670–1683.
Wahyuni Saputri1, Z. H. (2024). Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi Melalui Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Sejak Dini Di Lembaga Pendidikan. Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6), 547.
Widijowati, D. (2022). Determining Criminal Actions In Corruption : The Characteristics Of Freies Ermessen Principles. 2(1).
Wijaya, A. D. (2021). Kebijakan Formulasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Lata, 3(1), 47–67.
Yudha, E. F. T. (2023). Pendekatan Ekonomi Dalam Perampasan Dan Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Mahkamah Keadilan, 1(1), 1–29. Https://Jurnal.Uic.Ac.Id/Mk/Article/View/191
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nikodemus Suwito*, Ali Masyhar, Cahya Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology (eJESET)
ISSN 2723-6250 (Online)
Published by the SAINTIS Publishing
Homepage: http://ejeset.saintispub.com
Editor E-mail : ; editor.ejeset@gmail.com
Editorial Office Address:
