Article Open Access

Enhancing Cognitive Learning Outcomes through STEM-Based Instruction: Evidence from High School Reaction Rate Learning

(1) * Ucia Mahya Dewi Mail (Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24351, Indonesia)
(2) Agus Muliaman Mail (Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh Utara, 24351, Indonesia)
*Corresponding author

Abstract


This study examined the effect of the STEM learning model on improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes in reaction rate topics using a quantitative experimental approach with a non-equivalent control group design. Two pre-existing classes were assigned as the experimental group (STEM) and the control group (Direct Instruction), both of which were given pretest and posttest assessments. The sample consisted of 70 Grade 11 students selected through purposive sampling, with 35 students in each group. The instrument used was a cognitive learning outcomes test measuring content, context, and cognitive competencies. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality testing, and the Mann–Whitney U Test at a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that the STEM group achieved a higher mean N-gain score (0.63) compared to the control group (0.38), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that the STEM learning model has a positive and significant effect on improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes in reaction rate topics.

Keywords


Experimental Research; STEM; Reaction Rate; Cognitive Outcome

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v7i1.1390
      

Article metrics

Abstract views : 4 | PDF views : 0

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Abdul-Rahaman, A.-M., & Thomas Nipielim Tindam. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Education on Students’ Achievement in Secondary Schools. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i2.179

Adams, E. L. (2021). The effect of a middle grades STEM initiative on students’ cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100983

Aisyah, S. N., Sihaloho, M., Tangio, J. S., Lukum, A., Munandar, H., Thayban, T., & Kurniawati, E. (2025). The Effect of Using The PBL (Problem Based Learning) Learning Model Assisted by ChatGPT on Student Learning Outcomes in The Reaction Rate Material. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 7(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v7i2.33888

Aji, L. S., Zamhari, M., Saputra, F. I., & Masrukhah, D. (2024). Comparing STEM and contextual approaches’ impact on students’ motivation and learning in acid-base materials. Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 12(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v12i2.8040

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3. Bumi aksara.

Aurelya, V. A., & Carolina, H. S. (2024). The effect of PjBL-integrated STEM on students’ cognitive learning abilities class x high school. Edubiotik : Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 9(01), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v9i01.3979

Baulo, A., & Puertos, J. (2025). Comparative Effects of Direct Instruction and Educational Board Games on Chemistry Learning Performance Among High School Students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, V49(I9), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.490905

Chen, B., Chen, J., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2026). The Effects of Integrated STEM Education on K12 Students’ Achievements: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 96(2), 619–668. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251318297

De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2022). Integrated STEM Education: The Effects of a Long-Term Intervention on Students’ Cognitive Performance. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12738

Dila Padilah, & Ai Mahmudatussa’adah. (2025). The Implementation of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Learning Outcomes on the Chemical Reaction Rate Topic in Grade XI. Co-Catalyst: Journal of Science Education Research and Theories, 3(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.33830/cocatalyst.v3i1.13224

Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181

Fadilla, A. N. (2023). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Stem) Approaches to Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes in the Subject of Redox Reactions. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 6(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.17977/um033v6i1p41-47

Fadillah, M. A., Hirahmah, A., Asrizal, & Usmeldi. (2024). The Effect of STEM-Based Interventions on Learning Outcomes in High School: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 2(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol2-iss2/53

Ginting, F. W., Muliaman, A., Lukman, I. R., & Mellyzar, M. (2020). Analysis Of The Readiness Of Education Study Program Students To Become Pre-Service Teacher Based On Teacher Competency Standards. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 120–127.

Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2023). Learning Electric Circuits Using the STEM Approach to Improve Scientific Thinking Skills and Practice. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i2.223

Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000

Honcharuk, V., Zadorozhna, O., & Parakhnenko, V. (2024). Formation of Cognitive Activity of Students in the Process of Studying Chemistry. Pedagogy and Education Management Review, (3(17)), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.36690/2733-2039-2024-3-43-56

Johan, E., & Rohaeti, E. (2024). Does the Integrated Discovery Learning STEM Model Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry Learning? Meta-Analysis Study. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6879

Kartini, A., Husamah, H., Permana, F. H., & Mohd Shukri, A. A. Bin. (2024). PBL-based STEM: Its effect on the cognitive learning outcome of junior high school students. Jurnal Biolokus, 6(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v6i2.2673

Khatimah, M. H., & Chisbiyah, L. A. (2024). Fostering Engagement and Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Ethnochemical and STEM-based Pedagogies for Chemistry Learning in Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17977/jps.v12i12024p001

Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21200

Lou, A. J., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2020). Reducing the prior‐knowledge achievement gap by using technology‐assisted guided learning in an undergraduate chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21596

Macea Anaya, M., Chimbo Jumbo, J., & Baena Navarro, R. (2024). Evaluation of a stem-based didactic model for the development of scientific competences in high school students: a quasi-experimental study. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3, 85. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202485

Mateos-Núñez, M., Martínez-Borreguero, G., & Naranjo-Correa, F. L. (2020). Learning Science in Primary Education with STEM Workshops: Analysis of Teaching Effectiveness from a Cognitive and Emotional Perspective. Sustainability, 12(8), 3095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083095

Muhammad Azeem, & Dr. Shafqat Rasool. (2025). The Effectiveness of STEM-Based Education in Promoting Positive Attitudes Towards Science Among Elementary School Students. Social Sciences Spectrum, 4(1), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.01.219

Muliaman, A. (2021). Efektivitas Model Project Based Learning Berorientasi eXe Learning dan Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 13(1), 51–57.

Muliaman, A., Fitriani, H., Usrati, K., & Mirnawati, M. (2022). Influence of Quantum Teaching Learning Model Assisted Digital Media (Edmodo) Toward Science Literature and Self-Efficiency of Highschool Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2525–2530. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2328

Muliaman, A., on, R. S.-3rd A. I. S., & 2018, undefined. (2018). Relationship between Motivation and College Students Learning Outcomes on Chemical Kinetic Material at University. Atlantis-Press.ComA Muliaman, RD Suyanti3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and, 2018•atlantis-Press.Com. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aisteel-18/55909051

Nurmiati, E., Wahyono, S. B., Rhomadan, M. R., Khairah, N., & Tafrienda, U. N. (2025). Development of Metacognition-Based LKPD to Improve Conceptual Understanding in Reaction Rate Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(4), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10464

Nuryanto, Y., & Yuliardi, R. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbasis STEM Terhadap Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v4i2.147

Purba, J., Panggabean, F. T. M., & Sutiani, A. (2024). Development of General Chemistry Teaching Materials Using the PjBL-STEM Model to Enhance Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 9(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v9i2.39318

Rahmiati, R., Jalinus, N., Effendi, H., Fadillah, R., & Wulansari, R. E. (2024). Assessing the Impact of a STEM Learning Project Model on Artificial Intelligence Education in Higher Learning Institutions. Data and Metadata, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.623

Ritonga, A. N. W. (2023). Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Student Learning Outcomes In View From Cognitive Assessment On Material Reaction Rate. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 6(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.17977/um033v6i1p52-55

Sari, S. C., & Putri, R. E. (2022). The Effect of the PBL Learning Model Based on Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (Stem) On the Cognitive Abilities of Junior High School Students 1 Basa Ampek Balai Tapan. Universe, 3(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.24036/universe.v3i1.134

Sernicula, E. J. (2025). Effect of contextual and manipulative learning approaches on performance in chemistry of grade 12 STEM students. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences), 4(3). https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403354

Setiawan, V. R., Situmorang, M., & Silaban, R. (2025). Project-based learning with STEM to promote higher order thinking skills as a strategy to improve high school chemistry learning outcomes. Chemistry Teacher International. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2025-0025

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulastri, S., Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Juliana, Syahrial, & Ismi Zatya. (2025). STEM-Based Guided Inquiry in Colloid Practicums and Its Influence on Students’ Concept Mastery. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i2.23967

Sundari, R., Ahmed, O. S., Abdurrahman, A., & Herlina, K. (2021). Application Of Inquiry Based Learning Model Using Stem Approach to Reduce Students’ Intrinsic Cognitive Load. Insecta: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i1.2482

Tiara, F., & Sulistina, O. (2021). Development of Pisa 2015 Based Chemical Literacy Assessment Instrument For High School Students. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 6(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v6i12021p026

Ummah, M. N., & Nugroho, D. E. (2023). The Influence of Steam Project-Based Chemistry Learning with the Assistance of Chemsketch on Learning Outcomes and Creative Thinking Ability on Macromolecular Materials. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v6i4.80876

Utami, V., Viyanti, V., & Permadi, D. (2025). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A STEM-Integrated Problem-Based Learning Model. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 15(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v15i1.102313

Utmeemang, R., & Buaraphan, K. (2024). Effects of small-scale chemistry STEM integrated with local contexts for enhancing grade 11 students’ learning achievement and learning and innovation skills. Ecletica Quimica, 49. https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618.eq.v49.2024.e1561

Yang, H., Hu, L., Wang, H., & Xin, Y. (2025). Impact of Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Education on Students’ Cognitive and Non‐Cognitive Skills: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70079


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ucia Mahya Dewi* and Agus Muliaman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0